Power Rankings

Final Power Rankings 2014-2015

Rank - Team - Power Rating - Prorated Points - Prorated ROWs - Letter Grade - Last 3 - Last 10 - RTG Rating - RTG Rank

 

 1  New York Rangers       72612  113  49  A-  2-1-0  7-3-0  6800   1

 2  Ottawa Senators        66221   99  37  B-  3-0-0  6-2-2  5832   6

 3  Montréal Canadiens     66089  110  43  B+  3-0-0  5-2-3  5881   4

 4  St. Louis Blues        65898  109  42  B+  2-1-0  6-3-1  5872   5

 5  Tampa Bay Lightning    65560  108  47  B+  3-0-0  6-3-1  6086   2

 6  Minnesota Wild         64120  100  42  B   2-1-0  6-3-1  5904   3

 7  Anaheim Ducks          64046  109  43  B+  1-2-0  6-4-0  5802   7

 8  Washington Capitals    62812  101  40  B   2-1-0  6-3-1  5597   8

 9  Winnipeg Jets          62136   99  36  B-  2-0-1  6-3-1  5471  11

10  Vancouver Canucks      61372  101  42  B   3-0-0  6-3-1  5503   9

11  Columbus Blue Jackets  61211   89  33  C+  3-0-0  9-0-1  5277  15

12  Calgary Flames         60123   97  41  B-  2-1-0  6-3-1  5491  10

13  Chicago Blackhawks     59550  102  39  B   0-3-0  4-6-0  5369  13

14  Boston Bruins          59433   96  37  B-  0-2-1  5-3-2  5205  17

15  Dallas Stars           59403   92  37  B-  3-0-0  7-3-0  5376  12

16  Colorado Avalanche     58669   90  29  C+  3-0-0  6-4-0  5078  19


17  Detroit Red Wings      57626  100  39  B   2-0-1  4-4-2  5105  18

18  Los Angeles Kings      57596   95  38  B-  1-2-0  5-4-1  5348  14

19  New York Islanders     57464  101  40  B   1-1-1  4-3-3  5271  16

20  Nashville Predators    57229  104  41  B   0-3-0  4-4-2  5027  20

21  Florida Panthers       55245   91  30  C+  2-1-0  5-4-1  4918  21

22  Pittsburgh Penguins    53732   98  39  B-  1-1-1  3-5-2  4741  23

23  Philadelphia Flyers    53071   84  30  C   1-2-0  4-3-3  4578  24

24  San Jose Sharks        52057   89  36  C+  1-2-0  5-4-1  4802  22

25  New Jersey Devils      47297   78  27  C-  0-2-1  1-6-3  4048  25

26  Carolina Hurricanes    45636   71  25  D+  1-2-0  4-5-1  4008  26

27  Edmonton Oilers        40141   62  19  D   1-1-1  4-5-1  3344  27

28  Toronto Maple Leafs    34984   68  25  D+  1-1-1  3-5-2  2963  28

29  Buffalo Sabres         32119   54  15  D-  1-2-0  3-6-1  2704  29

30  Arizona Coyotes        28886   56  19  D-  0-3-0  3-7-0  2408  30

 

Like last year, I'll put up the different playoff match-ups and what teams will advance based on my formula. BUT, please remember that my power rankings say nothing about the future, only the past. For those interested, you'll find my personal choices in parentheses:

 

P1 Ana 4 vs. W2 Wpg 3 (Ana 4 Wpg 3)

P2 Van 4 vs. P3 Cgy 3 (Van 4 Cgy 3)

C1 StL 4 vs. W1 Min 3 (StL 3 Min 4)

C2 Nsh 3 vs. C3 Chi 4 (Nsh 1 Chi 4)

A1 Mtl 3 vs. E1 Ott 4 (Mtl 4 Ott 3)

A2 TBL 4 vs. A3 Det 2 (TBL 3 Det 4)

M1 NYR 4 vs. E2 Pit 0 (NYR 4 Pit 2)

M2 Wsh 4 vs. M3 NYI 2 (Wsh 3 NYI 4)

 

My Power Rankings "think" that only two teams, the Blackhawks and the Senators, will stage upsets, and that both will need seven games to do so. In fact, five of the eight match-ups are supposed to go all the way, and only the Rangers will sweep their opponents. I can't wait for tonight's games, in what promises to be the closest and tightest Stanley Cup playoffs in my lifetime, perhaps of all time! Go 'Hawks! And good luck to you all!

 

P.S. I'll be back with an update after each round.

Skriv en kommentar: (Klikk her)

123hjemmeside.no
Antall tegn tilbake: 160
OK Sender...

Marcos | Svar 18.04.2015 03.23

By the way, I really hope my Pens can overcome that huge difference in rating points and advance to de 2nd round while it looks not so easy.

Øyvind Schiøtt 18.04.2015 09.48

That being said, being Norwegian it's hard rooting for you guys here. Would be swell to see a rematch of the Cup Final in 1992, though. We need our revenge!

Øyvind Schiøtt 18.04.2015 09.45

It looks difficult for them, as the Rangers are amazing this year, but I was pleasantly surprised by Fleury in that first game! Tough start, but then...

Marcos | Svar 18.04.2015 03.11

Ok, I see... it is a great method, easy and very logic...though of course any sport is an exact science. They would be very boring if they were! haha

Øyvind Schiøtt 18.04.2015 09.44

Ha-ha! So true! Then I wouldn't be doing these lists all the time, or I would do them before the games were played.

Øyvind Schiøtt | Svar 17.04.2015 18.30

Hi, I'm really happy you still like my Power Rankings! I have to admit that the method I use for these "predictions" isn't an exact science. Tbc...

Øyvind Schiøtt 17.04.2015 18.45

4-3: Diff between 1 and 4,720
4-2: Diff between 4,721 and 9,440
4-1: Diff between 9,441 and 14,160
4-0: Diff between 14,161 and 18,880

for what it's worth...

Øyvind Schiøtt 17.04.2015 18.40

If the difference is between a quarter and a half, it's 4-2. The next quarter gives a 4-1 prediction, while those farther away from eachother, suggests a sweep.

Øyvind Schiøtt 17.04.2015 18.37

The difference is 18,880 rating points. If the diff is within a fourth of this total, then the "prediction" is 4-3 for that match-up.

Øyvind Schiøtt 17.04.2015 18.34

I find the difference in power rating between the top qualifier and the worst qualifier. This year these two teams actually meet in the first round, NYR vs Pit.

Se alle kommentarer

| Svar

Nyeste kommentarer

06.03 | 18:12

I'm doing a couple of concerts next weekend, so I'm not sure if I manage to get anything done this week, either, but I'll give it a shot...

...
06.03 | 18:10

It doesn't mean that I'm giving up, but I'd be surprised if I managed to catch up ahead of the playoffs. No comment from people has made me neglect it further.

...
06.03 | 18:06

Thanks, pal. I'm doing fine, but my schedule is terrible. Well, sort of... I'm extremely busy, and I just haven't had the time to keep up with this.

...
05.03 | 18:19

Unfortunatly, there are no more updates. I hope you are doing fine. I miss your power ranking :)

...
Du liker denne siden
Hei!
Prøv å lage din egen hjemmeside som jeg.
Det er enkelt, og du kan prøve det helt gratis.
ANNONSE